All solutions
Illustrative example — a representative workflow, not a named-customer case study. The data fields and product capabilities are real; the scenario and any figures are sample composites.
Research · Investment & strategy

Reading demand before it reaches the reports

Construction activity leads a lot of things analysts care about — regional growth, capital deployment, demand for everything that goes into and around a building. The hard part has always been getting that activity in a form you can actually model. This is how a research team turns the national permit record into a leading indicator.

Forward-lookingActivity ahead of lagging indices
Sector × geoStandardized development velocity
ThousandsOf portals normalized to one feed

The challenge

The best signal arrives in the worst format

An analyst who wants to use construction as a leading indicator faces a data problem, not an idea problem. Permit activity is exactly the kind of forward-looking, ground-truth signal a research process wants — but it's spread across thousands of municipal portals with no common schema, no common taxonomy, and no common geography.

Stitching that together by hand is a standing project in itself, which is why most research leans on the lagging, already-published series instead of the leading one buried in the records.

The approach

Standardize the activity, then treat it as a series

Builders Monitor delivers permit activity as a standardized feed — one schema, one work-class taxonomy, one municipal geography — across thousands of portals. A research team can build development-velocity series by sector and region, compare them, and fold them into models the same way they'd use any other indicator.

Because the normalization happens upstream, the analyst spends time on the thesis rather than on reconciling portal formats. The feed is the same data behind the platform's coverage view, so what's modeled and what's published stay consistent.

The outcome

A leading indicator the desk can actually use

The research team gets a construction signal in a shape that fits its workflow: queryable, segmentable, and comparable across geographies and time. It becomes one more series in the model — an early read on demand and capital deployment that doesn't wait for the lagging reports to catch up.

It becomes one more series in the model — an early read on demand that doesn't wait for the lagging reports to catch up.

Illustrative — investment-research workflow

The workflow

How it runs in the product

  1. 1
    Search

    Build the activity series

    Query permit activity by sector, work class, and geography to assemble development-velocity series you can track over time.

  2. 2
    Map

    Compare regions visually

    Lay velocity onto the map to see where activity is concentrating and how the pattern shifts across quarters.

  3. 3
    API / Exports

    Feed your models

    Pull standardized aggregates through the API or exports and treat construction as just another indicator in your research stack.

What powers it

The data behind the workflow

Each field below is a real product capability — normalized across thousands of municipal portals into one schema.

  • permit.issued_dateTurns activity into a time series.
  • permit.work_classSegments the signal by sector cleanly.
  • permit.valuationWeights the series by economic magnitude.
  • geography (TIGER place / county / state)Makes regional comparison consistent.
  • national coverageEnsures the indicator isn't blind to whole markets.

See it for your team

Start free with 50 record lookups a month. Search and browse are always free — you only spend a lookup when you open a full record.